Retour
Article pour les cliniciens

La troponine I cardiaque à haute sensibilité et les scores de risque cliniques chez les patients présentant un syndrome coronarien aigu présumé.



  • Chapman AR
  • Hesse K
  • Andrews J
  • Lee KK
  • Anand A
  • Shah ASV, et al.
Circulation. 2018 Oct 16;138(16):1654-1665. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036426. (Original)
PMID: 30354460
Lire le résumé Lire le texte intégral
Disciplines
  • Médecine d'urgence
    Relevance - 6/7
    Intérêt médiatique  - 6/7
  • - Cardiologie
    Relevance - 5/7
    Intérêt médiatique  - 6/7
  • Médecin hospitalier/Hospitaliste
    Relevance - 5/7
    Intérêt médiatique  - 5/7
  • Médecine interne (voir sous-spécialités ci-dessous)
    Relevance - 5/7
    Intérêt médiatique  - 5/7

Résumé (en anglais)

BACKGROUND: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays can help to identify patients who are at low risk of myocardial infarction in the emergency department. We aimed to determine whether the addition of clinical risk scores would improve the safety of early rule-out pathways for myocardial infarction.

METHODS: In 1935 patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of 2 rule-out pathways alone or in conjunction with low-risk TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) (0 or 1), GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) (=108), EDACS (Emergency Department Assessment of Chest Pain Score) (<16), or HEART (History, ECG, Age, Risk factors, Troponin) (=3) scores. The European Society of Cardiology 3-hour pathway uses a single diagnostic threshold (99th percentile), whereas the High-STEACS (High-Sensitivity Troponin in the Evaluation of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome) pathway applies different thresholds to rule out (<5 ng/L) and rule in (>99th percentile) myocardial infarction.

RESULTS: Myocardial infarction or cardiac death during the index presentation or at 30 days occurred in 14.3% of patients (276/1935). The European Society of Cardiology pathway ruled out 70%, with 27 missed events giving a negative predictive value of 97.9% (95% CI, 97.1-98.6). The addition of a HEART score =3 reduced the proportion ruled out by the European Society of Cardiology pathway to 25% but improved the negative predictive value to 99.7% (95% CI, 99.0-100; P<0.001). The High-STEACS pathway ruled out 65%, with 3 missed events for a negative predictive value of 99.7% (95% CI, 99.4-99.9). No risk score improved the negative predictive value of the High-STEACS pathways, but all reduced the proportion ruled out (24% to 47%; P<0.001 for all).

CONCLUSIONS: Clinical risk scores significantly improved the safety of the European Society of Cardiology 3-hour pathway, which relies on a single cardiac troponin threshold at the 99th percentile to rule in and rule out myocardial infarction. Where lower thresholds are used to rule out myocardial infarction, as applied in the High-STEACS pathway, risk scores halve the proportion of patients ruled out without improving safety.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01852123.


Commentaires cliniques (en anglais)

Emergency Medicine

The authors determined the value of adding one of two pathways (ESC or High STEACS) to several clinical prediction rules for ruling out MI. They used negative predictive values instead of likelihood ratios, but the former should not be used because they vary with the prevalence of disease. The best addition to the ESC was the HEART score (LR- = 0.02), whereas adding this to the High STEACS yielded an LR- of 0.007, making it the best regimen for ruling out MI.

Emergency Medicine

Evaluation of ACS in the emergency department continues to be a minefield. This study provides some guidance for the use of clinical decision instruments as well as specific high-sensitivity troponin cutoffs to standardize the decision-making process. However, it's uncertain how well this will generalize to other assays, of which there are many. It adds to the body of evidence, but is unlikely to independently influence practice.

Voulez-vous savoir ce que lisent les professionnels? Inscrivez-vous pour accéder gratuitement à tous les contenus professionnels.

S'inscrire