Retour
Article pour les cliniciens

L'insuffisance cardiaque chronique et la réadaptation par l'exercice: une revue systématique et méta-analyse.



  • Palmer K
  • Bowles KA
  • Paton M
  • Jepson M
  • Lane R
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Dec;99(12):2570-2582. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.03.015. Epub 2018 Apr 24. (Review)
PMID: 29698639
Lire le résumé Lire résumé des données probantes
Disciplines
  • Médecine familiale (MF)/Médecine générale (MG)
    Relevance - 7/7
    Intérêt médiatique  - 6/7
  • Médecine interne générale - Soins primaires
    Relevance - 7/7
    Intérêt médiatique  - 6/7
  • Médecine interne (voir sous-spécialités ci-dessous)
    Relevance - 6/7
    Intérêt médiatique  - 5/7
  • - Médecine physique et réadaptation
    Relevance - 6/7
    Intérêt médiatique  - 4/7
  • - Cardiologie
    Relevance - 5/7
    Intérêt médiatique  - 4/7

Résumé (en anglais)

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review was to identify the effect of specific exercise parameters on physical function and quality of life (QOL) in people with chronic heart failure living in the community.

DATA SOURCES: A total of 5 electronic databases were searched for relevant studies published after 1994.

STUDY SELECTION: The screening process was completed by 2 independent researchers, with a third independent reviewer for conflict resolution. Studies were selected if they included only chronic hHart failure participants, and the sole intervention was a structured exercise training program in an outpatient or community setting.

DATA EXTRACTION: Two independent researchers completed the data extraction and qualiy assessment. Quality was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation scales.

DATA SYNTHESIS: In total, 40 articles (n=5411) were included in the review for meta-analysis and meta-regression, including 27 randomized control trials and 13 cohort studies. Exercise was shown to have a positive effect on QOL outcomes (standardized mean difference 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-1.56) with the most commonly used measure, the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire, showing a clinically significant change of 8.5 points. Physical function was improved postexercise intervention in the 23 included studies (standardized mean difference 0.89; 95% CI, 0.40-1.38), with a clinically significant change of 49.8 m seen in studies using the 6-minute walk test (95% CI, 26.52-73.13). These improvements were independent of study design, study quality, participant demographics, disease severity, and exercise prescription variables.

CONCLUSION: Exercise significantly improves QOL and physical function. Current evidence suggests that engagement with exercise is a more important factor in achieving improvement than how the exercise is performed. Future research should aim to identify and address barriers to engagement in exercise rehabilitation in this population.


Voulez-vous savoir ce que lisent les professionnels? Inscrivez-vous pour accéder gratuitement à tous les contenus professionnels.

S'inscrire