Retour
Article pour les cliniciens

Efficacité des interventions d'autogestion de groupe menées par des non-spécialistes pour améliorer l'hémoglobine glyquée (HbA1c), l'auto-efficacité et les taux de visites aux urgences chez les adultes atteints de diabète de type 2: une revue systématique et méta-analyse



  • Tay JHT
  • Jiang Y
  • Hong J
  • He H
  • Wang W
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Jan;113:103779. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103779. Epub 2020 Sep 24. (Review)
PMID: 33080479
Lire le résumé
Disciplines
  • - Endocrinologie
    Relevance - 5/7
    Intérêt médiatique  - 4/7
  • Médecine familiale (MF)/Médecine générale (MG)
    Relevance - 4/7
    Intérêt médiatique  - 3/7
  • Médecine interne générale - Soins primaires
    Relevance - 4/7
    Intérêt médiatique  - 3/7

Résumé (en anglais)

BACKGROUND: Diabetes is a debilitating health condition that is rapidly increasing in prevalence globally. Diabetes self-management is known as an important aspect of diabetes care, and group-based self-management interventions led by lay leaders have been explored previously. However, the effects of such an interventional approach to improve glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, self-efficacy, and emergency visit rates among adults with type 2 diabetes remains inconclusive.

OBJECTIVES: To review and perform a meta-analysis systematically of the effectiveness of lay-led, group-based self-management interventions to improve HbA1c levels, self-efficacy, and frequency of emergency visit rates in adults with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted through the following seven databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, and Web of Science. Screening and assessment for risk of bias were conducted by two independent reviewers. Meta-analyses were performed for HbA1c levels, self-efficacy, and frequency of emergency visits, using RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS: Sixteen randomized controlled trials were included in this review. Meta-analyses results indicated significant effects on HbA1c (pooled MD = 0.23, 95% CI [-0.41, -0.05], p = 0.01) self-efficacy (d = 0.27; 95% CI [0.19, 0.36]; p <0.00001), and frequency of emergency visits (pooled MD = 0.15; 95% CI [-0.26, -0.05]; p = 0.004], favoring the intervention groups. However, possible publication bias was detected. Significant heterogeneity was observed for HbA1c but not for self-efficacy or frequency of emergency visits.

CONCLUSIONS: Possible effects of lay-led, group-based self-management interventions on improving HbA1c, self-efficacy, and frequency of emergency visits among adults with type 2 diabetes were demonstrated in this review. Although possible publication bias and heterogeneity were detected for HbA1c, the results point toward a potentially feasible and effective treatment for adults with type 2 diabetes, allowing them to manage and sustain self-care behaviors.


Commentaires cliniques (en anglais)

Endocrine

This study is more relevant to clinical nurses but not doctors.

Endocrine

It would be helpful to know how long the benefits were sustained - the follow up is 1 year in all the studies in this meta-analysis.

General Internal Medicine-Primary Care(US)

It is unclear which part of the intervention actually works. My bias is that almost anything that shows that someone takes a personal interest in what the diabetic does to manage their disease improves control, whether it is a lay-person or a medical professional. In a chronic disease requiring repetitive attention to al of the details of management a "nudge" may be a critical piece of improved management.

Voulez-vous savoir ce que lisent les professionnels? Inscrivez-vous pour accéder gratuitement à tous les contenus professionnels.

S'inscrire