Retour
Article de santé publique

Effets des interventions non pharmacologiques en tant qu'adjuvants vaccinaux chez l'homme : une revue systématique et méta-analyse en réseau



Examiner l'évaluation de la qualité : 9 (strong)

Référence: Vedhara K, Royal S, Sunger K, Caldwell DM, Halliday V, Taylor CM, et al. (2021). Effects of non-pharmacological interventions as vaccine adjuvants in humans: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 15(2), 245-271.

Lien vers PubMed

Résumé (en anglais)

INTRODUCTION: Psychological and behavioural may enhance vaccine effectiveness. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to examine the effects of non-pharmacological adjuvants on vaccine effectiveness, as measured by antibody responses to vaccination.

AREAS COVERED: Electronic databases (EMBASE, Medline, PsychINFO, CINAHL) were searched from inception to 6th February 2018. This yielded 100 eligible papers, reporting 106 trials: 79 interventions associated with diet and/or nutrition; 12 physical activity interventions and 9 psychological interventions.Over half (58/106) of trials reported evidence of an enhanced antibody response to vaccination across one or more outcomes. The NMA considered the comparative effects between all intervention types, control and placebo for antibody titres (48 studies), seroconversion (25 studies) and seroprotection (23 studies) separately. The NMA provided weak evidence in support of nutritional formulae and probiotics in increasing antibody titres.

EXPERT OPINION: This review offers a comprehensive summary of the literature on non-pharmacological interventions as vaccine adjuvants. The evidence is characterised by considerable heterogeneity but provides early evidence in support of nutritional formulae and probiotic interventions. Psychological and exercise-based interventions were characterised by limited and unreliable evidence. Large, well-designed studies including consistent core outcomes and measures of intervention adherence and fidelity are required.


Mots-clés

adolescents (13-19), adultes (20-59), aînés (60+), COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2, enfants d’âge préscolaire (1-4), enfants d’âge scolaire (5-12), immunisation, maladies transmissibles/infections, méta-analyse, milieu de soins de santé, modification du comportement, nourrissons (0-1)

Voulez-vous savoir ce que lisent les professionnels? Inscrivez-vous pour accéder gratuitement à tous les contenus professionnels.

S'inscrire