Article de santé publique

Comparaisons des interventions pour prévenir les chutes chez les personnes âgées: une revue systématique et méta-analyse.

Examiner l'évaluation de la qualité : 10 (strong)

Référence: Tricco A, Thomas S, Veroniki A, Hamid J, Cogo E, Strifler L, et al. (2017). Comparisons of interventions for preventing falls in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 318(17), 1687-1699.

Résumé des données probantes Lien vers PubMed

Résumé (en anglais)

IMPORTANCE: Falls result in substantial burden for patients and health care systems, and given the aging of the population worldwide, the incidence of falls continues to rise.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the potential effectiveness of interventions for preventing falls.
DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Ageline databases from inception until April 2017. Reference lists of included studies were scanned.
STUDY SELECTION: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of fall-prevention interventions for participants aged 65 years and older.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Pairs of reviewers independently screened the studies, abstracted data, and appraised risk of bias. Pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis were conducted.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES:Injurious falls and fall-related hospitalizations.
RESULTS: A total of 283 RCTs (159?910 participants; mean age, 78.1 years; 74% women) were included after screening of 10?650 titles and abstracts and 1210 full-text articles. Network meta-analysis (including 54 RCTs, 41?596 participants, 39 interventions plus usual care) suggested that the following interventions, when compared with usual care, were associated with reductions in injurious falls: exercise (odds ratio [OR], 0.51 [95% CI, 0.33 to 0.79]; absolute risk difference [ARD], -0.67 [95% CI, -1.10 to -0.24]); combined exercise and vision assessment and treatment (OR, 0.17 [95% CI, 0.07 to 0.38]; ARD, -1.79 [95% CI, -2.63 to -0.96]); combined exercise, vision assessment and treatment, and environmental assessment and modification (OR, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.13 to 0.70]; ARD, -1.19 [95% CI, -2.04 to -0.35]); and combined clinic-level quality improvement strategies (eg, case management), multifactorial assessment and treatment (eg, comprehensive geriatric assessment), calcium supplementation, and vitamin D supplementation (OR, 0.12 [95% CI, 0.03 to 0.55]; ARD, -2.08 [95% CI, -3.56 to -0.60]). Pairwise meta-analyses for fall-related hospitalizations (2 RCTs; 516 participants) showed no significant association between combined clinic- and patient-level quality improvement strategies and multifactorial assessment and treatment relative to usual care (OR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.33 to 1.81]).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Exercise alone and various combinations of interventions were associated with lower risk of injurious falls compared with usual care. Choice of fall-prevention intervention may depend on patient and caregiver values and preferences.


activité physique, aînés (60+), clinique, communauté, domicile, éducation/sensibilisation et perfectionnement professionnel/formation, méta-analyse, modification du comportement, nutrition, prévention des blessures/sécurité, santé des aînés

Voulez-vous savoir ce que lisent les professionnels? Inscrivez-vous pour accéder gratuitement à tous les contenus professionnels.